Independent minds

Built to behave like a real room, not a polite chatbot.

Most AI panels are one voice in costume. Plenary is built so each participant keeps their own view, reacts to every comment as it happens, and speaks when someone in their seat would.

Outside Biases Removed

The AI's bias

Left alone, every AI character sounds alike: agreeable, balanced, eager to help. Plenary grounds each participant in their own background, experience and knowledge, so a skeptical buyer stays sceptical and a busy operator stays short on patience.

The room's bias

In a real group, the first or loudest opinion pulls everyone toward it. In Plenary, each participant forms a view before hearing anyone else's. When they do change their mind, you can see who changed it and when.

One chat playing four charactersillustrative
  • Interesting idea. Could be really useful for a lot of freelancers.7/10
  • Could be helpful, though some people may already have an accountant.6/10
  • Promising, depending on the integrations.7/10
  • Great for anyone who loses receipts!8/10
Four names, one tone. Every answer hedges the same way.
Plenary · same four, same concept
  • Quarterly estimates are the part I dread. I'd try it.7/10
  • $12 on top of the accountant I already pay? No.4/10
  • Depends whether it reads my bank feed or I upload everything.6/10
  • I lose receipts constantly. This is for me.8/10
Four views, formed separately, before anyone heard the others.

A poll after every comment, against every participant

After each comment, every participant is asked how it landed, what they are thinking and whether they want to say something. A separate analyst reads their answers and assigns an urge score from −10 to +10, along with a read of their emotional response. Participants never score themselves.

Urge score, session 0418 select any cell stepped in
#1 · ModeratorLedger files your receipts and drafts your quarterly tax estimate for $12 a month. #2 · TomI already pay someone to do my taxes. This is a second bill for the same job. #3 · AishaDoes your accountant chase your receipts every quarter? Mine charges extra for that. #4 · RafaHonestly, I'd pay just for the receipt photos. #5 · MeiHang on. Without the bank feed, you're still doing the chasing. #6 · ModeratorTom, has anything changed for you? Aisha Okafor spoke Tom Brandt spoke Mei Lin spoke Rafa Silva spoke
Mei Linafter comment #4 Rafa: “Honestly, I'd pay just for the receipt photos.”
Their answers to the poll Photos don't solve anything. You still have to take them. Want to speak? Yes. Now.
Analyst's read +8 Frustrated, feels the point is being missed

Stepping in, out of turn

Real conversations don't go round the table in order. When a participant's urge runs high because they disagree, know something the room doesn't, or feel misread, they step in without waiting to be asked. When it runs low, they stay quiet, however long it has been since they last spoke.

#4 · RafaHonestly, I'd pay just for the receipt photos.
Poll: “Photos don't solve anything. You still have to take them.” · wants to speak now+8
#5 · MeiOut of turnHang on. Without the bank feed, you're still doing the chasing.

Audit of thought

Every participant's thinking is kept at every stage and after every comment, including the ones who never said a word. Select any moment to see what the whole room was thinking.

  • Aisha Okafor Speaking at this point. No poll · speaker
  • Tom Brandt+2 Fair. She does bill me for the April catch-up. Conceding privately, guarded · stayed silent
  • Mei Lin+3 Chasing is only solved if it reads the bank. Engaged · stayed silent
  • Rafa Silva+5 This is exactly my problem. Relieved, aligned · stayed silent

The session ends. The conversation doesn't have to.

After every session, you can ask any participant a follow-up question. They answer from everything they saw, heard and thought during it, including what they chose not to say.

Follow-up with Tom Brandtsession 0418 loaded · 6 polls

After Aisha's point about the April catch-up, you went quiet. What were you thinking?

That she was right, and I didn't want to concede it in front of everyone. My accountant charges me about $400 every April to sort out receipts. If Ledger removes that, $12 a month is cheap.

What would have got you to say so at the time?

Being asked directly. Which the moderator did, eventually, at #6.